A few thoughts on age and romance novels

I’ve been reading an excellent sci-fi romance by Jessie Mihalik. Polaris Rising (2019) is set in the far distant future. Humankind has spread across the galaxy but remains deeply capitalist. A small number of rich families live like the aristocrats of old, their actions affecting the lives of millions of people.

The lead female character, Ada, is a younger daughter of one of these aristocratic families. When the story begins, she’s on the run from her father and determined to avoid an arranged marriage. She meets Loch, an outlaw with a very dangerous reputation. From the point of view of any romance reader, he’s a very attractive person. He’s capable, knowledgeable, strong, and thoughtful.

However, one thing makes it difficult for me to picture Loch in the way that I would like. And that’s what I want to talk about in this blog post today. It’s his age. The story specifically states that he’s in his mid-twenties.

This specificity made Loch’s character less romantically appealing to me as an older reader. For much of the book, I was able to pretend that he and Ada were somewhere vaguely in their thirties. (It’s reasonable to assume that people might live a lot longer in a space-faring civilisation, meaning that adulthood starts later.)

As soon as Loch’s age was specified, he became someone young enough to be my son. He’s still capable, knowledgeable, strong, and thoughtful, of course. But from my position as an older reader, he’s no longer the same. He’s nowhere near my stage of life, so I can’t see him in “that way.”

In most genres of fiction, the age of the main characters is not that important. It doesn’t matter to me how old the detective is in a crime novel. But romance is different, particularly when the love interest’s immediate physical appeal is integral to the other main character’s motivations. (It isn’t Loch’s mind that first attracts Ada.) In this kind of romance, the love interest should ideally be someone the reader doesn’t feel too distanced from. Otherwise, we can’t immerse ourselves in the other character’s feelings toward them.

Being able to identify with the character who is in love is another important part of the reading experience. Their feelings need to be understandable to us in a visceral way.

In romances where the characters’ ages are not specified too heavily, the reader can imagine them as slightly older than the author perhaps originally intended. When the ages are clearly specified, it cements the characters into a particular life stage and risks distancing readers who are in a very different period of life.

Supernatural romances tend to avoid this problem. When the love interest is many centuries old, it places them outside the usual flow of human life. Readers of all ages can imagine themselves swooning over a 1,000-year-old vampire without the worry of “he’s too young / too old for me.”

All this brings me to two conclusions. Firstly, in romances about adult couples, a little vagueness about age is not a bad thing. Secondly, it’s important that we have romances about adult characters at all life stages.

For me, the issue with Loch isn’t that he’s different to me. I’m not an adventurer in space and he’s not a 21st-century Englishwoman. The issue is that life stages are an important aspect of how humans relate to each other. He’s literally not in the same train carriage as me.

Lucy Worsley’s Victorian Murder Club

I love Lucy Worsley’s TV shows. Formerly a curator at the Historic Royal Palaces, she now presents history programmes that explore topics in depth. Her enthusiastic style has made her a popular TV favourite.

Her most recent show is the Victorian Murder Club, a three-part series investigating a serial killer contemporary to Jack the Ripper. The “Thames Torso Murderer” was active in London in the same decade and never caught.

I doubted I’d enjoy it, given the subject, but I gave it a chance because it was Worsley. The show turned out to be fascinating and I kind of miss it now that it’s over.

My favourite parts were when Worsley discussed the forensic reports and the killer’s activities with professional experts who assist the justice process today. They were able to give informed advice about how the Thames Torso Murderer compares to other modern serial killers.

Most notably, one specialist gave comment on the Victorian police’s forensic reports. Her thoughts were particularly useful and helped dispel one theory.

Consulting these experts helped to communicate that these events really happened and affected real people. It also shed an interesting light on how advanced police techniques already were at that time.

As I’m sure you’re aware, Jack the Ripper is so well known that he’s almost a cartoonish figure these days. In Worsley’s show there was no danger of the same thing happening to the Thames Torso Murderer.

I really liked the respectful attention that Worsley paid to the victims themselves. Where possible, she visited their burial sites and tried to learn about their lives.

The third episode provides a convincing theory about who the serial killer might have been. The man identified is known to have committed crimes against women on the Thames. The reports from survivors give a disturbing indication of what may have happened to the Thames Torso Murderer’s victims.

It’s okay if you don’t want to watch Lucy Worsley’s Victorian Murder Club. We’ve had decades of TV sensationalising the murders of women and glorifying serial killers. It’s quite understandable if you’d rather not watch anything about murder ever again.

However, I do think this show counterbalances the sins of earlier television trends. It’s an emotionally intelligent production that brings real history alive without lionising any of the criminals mentioned.

Long lives, many changes

When I was a child, life in Britain was relatively stable. Desktop computers, mobile phones, and the internet had yet to cause significant disruption to daily life. Out-of-town shopping malls were the only real competition for the streets of shops that ran through most town centres.

Then the internet became widespread and changed our lives. It was a disaster for shopkeepers, but for anyone who enjoyed writing, it greatly opened up opportunities. Writers became bloggers, social media experts, copywriters, editors, and self-published authors.

In the decades before the internet, there weren’t so many career opportunities for writers. If they weren’t accepted by publishing houses, advertising agencies, or magazines, there wasn’t much else out there.

As we all know, the following 20 to 30 years were quite different. Writers used the internet to make names for themselves, writing in many different fields. They also earned a good living behind the scenes, in marketing and other areas of commercial communication.

A few years ago, the public release of Gen AI helped to bring the writers’ golden age to an end. Jobs for writers still exist, and creative writing is going strong … but things are different now.

Today’s writing prompt asks, “What are your thoughts on the concept of living a very long life?”

I think people who live for a long time experience a lot of change. New conditions come in and become normal for a few decades before giving way to something completely different.

Even though I lived through the first internet revolution, I didn’t expect this most recent change. I thought that the opportunities for writers would stay the same forever. I imagine that people in their eighties and nineties wouldn’t have been so easily surprised!

Daily writing prompt
What are your thoughts on the concept of living a very long life?